New Quick.Cart v4.1 - stable version - released!

treewood (OpenSolution)

2011-05-18 08:49

You can get this version from download here:
http://opensolution.org/download/

You can test this version here:
http://opensolution.org/Quick.Cart/demo/

Changes here:
http://opensolution.org/download/Quick.Cart/changeLog.txt

Bug fixes included in this version:
http://opensolution.org/download/Quick.Cart/bugFixes.txt

HOW TO UPDATE DATABASE FROM v4.0?
1. We DIDN'T changed database structure in v4.1. You can download new version and overwrite all files in "db/" directory from v4.0

2. Changed or added files in v4.1
actions_admin/settings.php
config/general.php
core/common.php
core/files.php
core/files-admin.php
core/orders-admin.php
core/pages.php
core/products.php
lang/*.php
plugins/tinymce/*.*
templates/default.css
templates/mobile_default.css
templates/pages_default.css
templates/products_default.css
templates/admin/container.tpl
templates/admin/files.tpl
templates/admin/pages.tpl
templates/admin/products.tpl
templates/admin/settings.tpl
admin.php

If You want to update from Quick.Cart v4.0. Check changes using Total Commander. Select file in Quick.Cart v4.0 (first column) and the same file in Quick.Cart v4.1 (second column) and click in menu "Files" > "Compare by Content". You will find changes made by us.

beholder

2011-06-12 20:51

may I direct your attention to this issue:
http://opensolution.org/Quick.Cart/forum/?p=readTopic&nr=7356

it seems like some server don't like when there is the > character in the form submit field value. You have that in templates/orders_basket.tpl.

http://cicmanec.sk/easyplugins/

treewood (OpenSolution)

2011-06-14 16:37

thanks very much. this issue will be fixed in next version

baronjon

2011-06-19 11:07

Nice job, but I don't like your CSS. I looked at v3. That's perfect. Easy to change, very flexible. In v4... that's something like ****. Conaitner main container main container main.. that's terrible. It's very hard to understand for new users who wanna change the skin. For experienced users it's better but not better than in the earlier version. I've never met anything so ***** in styles like in your current version. And default skin is not attractive. I like your functionality, but I don't like your CSS. I tried to make a template on v3 and v4. v4 took 200% more time to implement that. I'm shocked.

beholder

2011-06-19 15:58

I had to use the <div class="clear"></div> a lot in these containers and mains, because in Opera the divs were collapsed in height (even though they had some content inside ) unless the clearing div was used in them properly.

I have a suspicion that the devs used the different containers for solving of the IE box model problem. It's not ideal due to the over-complicated structure, but it works. Perhaps Treewood could share some light on this, I might be wrong.